The Benefits That a Novel Antimicrobial Provides When Viewed From an Insurance Value Perspective

Objectives: Traditional health economic evaluations of antimicrobials and other therapeutics such as vaccines currently underestimate their value to wider society. It can be supplemented by additional value elements including insurance value, which captures the value of a novel antimicrobial in preventing or mitigating impacts of adverse risk events such as those related to Covid-19 and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Despite being commonplace in other sectors, constituents of the impacts and approaches for estimating insurance value of therapeutics have not been investigated. Method(s): This study assessed the insurance value of a novel antimicrobial, from the operational healthcare costs and several wider population health and societal perspectives. This was done by: (1) identifying risk events pertaining to 4 relevant scenarios: ward closures, unavoidable shortage of conventional antimicrobials, viral respiratory pandemics and catastrophic AMR, through literature review and multidisciplinary expert workshops, (2) parameterising constituent mitigable costs and frequencies of the risk events, and (3) applying a Monte Carlo simulation model for extreme events, and a dynamic disease transmission model. Modelling was implemented in Excel and R. Result(s): The mean insurance value across all scenarios and perspectives was 718m over a 10-year period, should AMR levels remain unchanged, where only 134m related to operational healthcare costs. The viral respiratory pandemics and catastrophic AMR scenarios contributed most to this value (290m and 297m respectively). This overall value would be 50-70% higher if AMR levels steadily increased or if a more risk-averse view (1-in-10 year downside) of future events is taken. Conclusion(s): The insurance value of a novel antimicrobial can be systematically modelled, and substantially augments their traditional health economic value in normal circumstances. These approaches are generalisable to any health intervention, and form a framework for health systems and governments to recognise broader value in health technology assessments and increase resilience by planning for adverse scenarios. Copyright © 2022

Rapid return to normal activities at a residential summer camp during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Aim: Infection prevention and control (IPC) within residential settings is a central focus of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Youth residential summer camps are an excellent model for such environments and have thus far had mixed results. The aim of this report was to describe the successful implementation of a seven-week overnight summer camp with rapid return to normal activities from June to August 2020. Subjects and methods: This retrospective study included 427 individuals who traveled from 24 US states. All staff and campers were tested by serial nasopharyngeal PCR tests in the context of strict infection prevention and control (IPC) measures, including cohorts and masking. The entire camp population was isolated from non-camp personnel with special measures for food, supply, and mail delivery. Results: During the two-week staff session, one staff member tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, was isolated, and sent safely off premises. All other campers and staff had three negative PCR tests: 1-8 days before arrival, upon arrival, and 5-6 days after arrival. After these three negative tests, 6 days into camp, most IPCs, including masking, were successfully lifted and a normal camp experience was possible. Conclusions: These findings indicate that serial PCR-based testing and strict adherence to IPC measures among cohorts can allow for successful assumption of near normal group activities in a residential setting during the COVID-19 pandemic. This result at an overnight summer camp has broad implications for similar residential communities such as boarding schools, other youth education and development programs, as well as nursing homes and military installations. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10389-021-01597-9.

Online child psychotherapy and the pandemic–vignettes from the Canadian Association of Psychoanalytic Child Therapists

At a time when psychoanalytic psychotherapists are struggling worldwide to provide ongoing psychotherapy to children and adolescents during the current pandemic, this paper provides three vignettes, which focus on the impact of the pandemic and of providing psychotherapy online. These vignettes elaborate on contributions made to ‘Town Hall’ meetings of the Canadian Association of Psychoanalytic Child Therapists. We describe some of what we have learned in our efforts to provide online therapy during this disjointed time. We conclude by reflecting on the crucial importance of peer groups meeting together to contain our own pandemic anxieties, to maintain the therapeutic frame in online treatment, and to be supportive of the internal psychic frames of our patients, all of which have been battered during the pandemic.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on stroke care at the university of rochester medical center

Introduction: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic response on medical care for stroke is unknown. Methods: We used local “Get With The Guidelines” stroke data for patients with ischemic stroke (IS), transient ischemic attack (TIA), and intracerebral hemorrhage/subarachnoid hemorrhage (ICH/SAH) from March 20-April 14, 2020 (study period) and January 1-March 19, 2020 (control period #1) and March 20-April 14, 2019 (control period #2). We examined daily admission rates, transfers, tPA administration, thrombectomy, and time from last well to hospital arrival. Results: There were 349 patients (n=40 study period, n=225 control period #1, n=84 control period #2);263 with IS, 37 with TIA, and 49 with ICH/SAH. Overall, 46% were female, 82% white, with median age 70 years (IQR 58-82 years). Daily admission rates were 1.4 IS/day for the study period compared to 2.1 IS/day (Incident rate ratio [IRR] 1.49 95% CI 1.05-2.13, p=0.027) and 2.2 IS/day (IRR 1.57 1.04-2.37, p=0.033) for control periods #1 and #2 (Table), respectively. There was only one admission for TIA in the study period compared to approximately one every 4 days in control period #1 (IRR 7.2 95% CI 1.0-53.7, p=0.053) and one every 2 days in control period #2 (IRR 14.0 95% CI 1.8-106.5, p=0.011). ICH/SAH admissions were fewer in the study period. Transfers were less common with approximately one transfer every four days in the study period compared to one each day of the control periods. Rates of tPA, thrombectomy, and time from last well to first hospital contact did not differ across the epochs. Conclusions: Our data suggest the COVID-19 pandemic response has led to reduced admissionvolumes for all stroke types in the University of Rochester Medical Center catchment area, partlydue to decreases in hospital transfers. These data raise the question whether fewer patients soughtcare for stroke symptoms at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.